Archive for the ‘Liberty’ Category

Albany Rally Protests Mandatory Swine Flu Vaccine

Sunday, October 18th, 2009
Ralliers protest mandatory H1N1 vaccination. (Louise McCoy/The Epoch Times)

Ralliers protest mandatory H1N1 vaccination. (Louise McCoy/The Epoch Times)

New York health care workers protest mandatory swine flu vaccine

By Louise McCoy
Epoch Times Staff

ALBANY—On Tuesday, Sept. 29, about 200 New York state health care workers gathered at the Capitol steps to express their opposition to the mandatory swine flu vaccination. If health care workers refuse mandatory vaccination, it would mean loss of their jobs and fines for their employers.

The situation puts them in a triple bind as they also feel responsible for their patients and are devoted to their profession.

Richard Daines, M.D., New York State commissioner of health, and Gov. Paterson have decided there will be a state of emergency this fall when the swine flu is supposed to rev up and become a serious threat. A mandate that allows for no exceptions, with punishments for those who do not comply, is deemed necessary. Every health care worker must have a regular flu shot as well as a swine flu shot before Nov. 30.

The New York Nurses Association, representing 37,000 nurses came out against the mandate in July with testimony before the State Hospital Review and Planning Council.

But because the unions would not organize a rally, Heather Walker, a single mom from the Albany Campaign for Liberty (ACL), took the helm. ACL is a non-profit organization to defend American principles of individual liberty.

ACL member Kevin McCashion host of the rally, opened by reminding everyone of their civil liberties under the 14th Amendment and their right to informed consent under New York state law: “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has the right to determine what is done to his own body … know what risks are involved and any alternatives. Today we present these alternatives and assess the risks.”

He spiced his speech with a few quotes from Thomas Jefferson: “If the people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as the souls of those who live under tyranny.”

He ended by comparing Paterson and Daines to King George the Third and citing the Declaration of Independence amid cheers and whistles.

The keynote speaker was Gary Null, Ph.D. , famous in nutrition and alternative health circles for his books and radio programs. He spoke briefly before he had to dash inside for a meeting with the governor’s health aide, Dr. Daines, and assorted M.D.s and attorneys. Null mentioned the front page of the New York Times business section that reported the money the pharmaceutical companies were getting from the coming vaccine bonanza.

He said the government has missed the point in its mandate: “Are vaccines safe and effective? Where’s the proof?”

Later he addressed the questions: “Are vaccines unsafe, and what is the proof? Why are we pumping tens of billions into the biggest health fraud in history?”

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

EU Lisbon Treaty Suffers Another Setback

Thursday, October 1st, 2009
A man holds a placard reading No lisbon treaty, Yes freedom of Europen nations during a demonstration against the Lisbon Treaty in front of the embassy of Ireland on September 24 in Prague. (Michal Cizek/AFP/Getty Images)

A man holds a placard reading ''No lisbon treaty, Yes freedom of Europen nations'' during a demonstration against the Lisbon Treaty in front of the embassy of Ireland on September 24 in Prague. (Michal Cizek/AFP/Getty Images)

By Milan Kajínek
Epoch Times Staff
Sep 30, 2009

Czech Republic senators filed a complaint against the Lisbon Treaty with the Czech court on Tuesday. This move is likely to further delay the progress of the Treaty.

Czech is one of four countries that has not yet given their consent to the Treaty, which is predicted to have a major impact on the powers of the European Parliament. The Treaty cannot enter into force until all 27 EU member states have given their consent.

Czech President Vaclav Klaus says he is not ready to consider signing the EU’s reform treaty until a court rules whether it violates the country’s constitution. He said he will not sign the Treaty until the Irish have said approved to the referendum, which will be held this Friday.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

Chinese Dissidents Gather at Consulate

Thursday, October 1st, 2009
Protestors from the Democratic Forum of China lay down and drape a banner over themselves in protest of the Chinese Communist Partys 60 years of rule, at the Chinese consulate in New York, Sept. 30, 2009. (Aloysio Santos/The Epoch Times)

Protestors from the Democratic Forum of China lay down and drape a banner over themselves in protest of the Chinese Communist Party's 60 years of rule, at the Chinese consulate in New York, Sept. 30, 2009. (Aloysio Santos/The Epoch Times)

By Matthew Robertson
Epoch Times Staff
Sep 30, 2009

Zhang Jing, who spends her spare time trying to help women in China, never thought that in the U.S. she’d see the colors of communist China on the Empire State Building.

“I felt sick,” she said, standing in the cold wind outside the Chinese Embassy on Wednesday night.

She had come out to protest the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 60 years of rule in China. What made her sick was the Empire State Building lighting up in red and yellow to honor the occasion.

Many in the Chinese community see the move as an affront, tantamount to America betraying them. “I never expected this to happen in America. I came to the U.S. to escape tyranny, and now when I come here I see it again. If I knew it would be like this, I wouldn’t have chosen to come to the U.S. I’d have gone to Europe back then.”

For people like Zhang Jing, communist China conjures images of violence, hatred, corruption, political repression, and fear. These are the modus operandi of the CCP, according to any dissident.

It was the first time Women’s Rights in China, her organization, had come out to protest. Just recently the CCP had blocked access to their Web site in the mainland, for no apparent reason, she said. “They’re just stingy, just petty and stingy. Even something as simple as women’s rights, they have to block it.” So Zhang Jing came out to make her voice heard.

On either side of Zhang were veteran democracy activists and Falun Gong practitioners, holding their own banners.

full text here
  • Share/Bookmark

Department of Children and Family Services Threats To Take Children Ruled Illegal

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

By Ofelia Casillas and Matt O’Connor
Chicago Tribune
March 15, 2005

A federal judge ruled that Illinois families were deprived of their constitutional rights when state child welfare officials threatened to separate parents from their children during abuse investigations.

In a decision made public Monday, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer found “ample evidence” that families suffered emotional and psychological injuries because the separations lasted “for more than a brief or temporary period.”

The judge didn’t fault the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) for erring on the side of caution in such cases, but she held that parents had a right to know the length of the expected separations and how to contest the restrictions.

In telephone interviews with the Tribune, families described being shocked, paranoid and frightened by the allegations that some thought would result in them losing their children. Parents felt that caseworkers assumed them to be guilty.

A father from Skokie spent almost a year away from his family, and the effects of the rift that developed between them remain years later.

“I don’t think it can ever be repaired. We are all broken up; we are not bonded the way that we used to be,” said the father, who requested that he only be identified by his first name, Patrick. “I cannot get over what they did to me. It devastated my whole entire life. I can never be the same again.”

The ruling shows the dilemma facing the oft-criticized DCFS in its charge to protect children from harm but also keep families together when possible.

At issue are safety plans, part of the wholesale reforms instituted by DCFS after the public uproar over the horrific 1993 death of 3-year- old Joseph Wallace, who was killed by his mentally-ill mother after he was returned to her by the state.

In her decision, Pallmeyer essentially held that DCFS had gone too far in protecting children and had eroded the constitutional rights of parents.

The safety plans are supposedly voluntary agreements by parents in most cases to leave their home indefinitely or stay under constant supervision after investigations into child abuse or neglect are launched, often based on tips to DCFS.

But most of the families who testified at a 22-day hearing in 2002 and 2003 said the investigators threatened to take away their children unless they agreed to the safety plans.

“When an investigator expressly or implicitly conveys that failure to accept a plan will result in the removal of the children for more than a brief or temporary period of time, it constitutes a threat sufficient to deem the family’s agreement coerced, and to implicate due process rights,” Pallmeyer wrote in the 59-page opinion.

“Significantly, [DCFS] has not identified a single family that, faced with such an express or implied threat of protective custody, chose to reject the plan,” the judge said.

Pallmeyer gave DCFS 60 days to develop “constitutionally adequate procedures” for families to contest the safety plans.

Diane Redleaf, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys, said about 10 families were involved in the court case, but that Pallmeyer’s decision would affect thousands of families who agree to safety plans each year.

“Instead of protecting children, the state is actually destroying families and hurting children,” Redleaf said.

Diane Jackson, a DCFS spokeswoman, said Pallmeyer’s review of safety plans was limited to 2002 and before and didn’t consider changes since then.

“We have definitely made changes,” said Jackson, declining to be more specific until DCFS can report to Pallmeyer.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

FDA Approves Stevia, Ends the Era of Oppression of this Herbal Sweetener

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

By Mike Adams

naturalnews.com

Update note: This breaking news article has been updated from its original version to clarify the nature of the FDA’s GRAS “approval” for stevia. In the original breaking news, we reported that the FDA had granted GRAS approval to stevia. Technically, the FDA has only issued letters of “no objection” regarding companies’ self-affirmation of GRAS approval for stevia. In other words, the FDA hasn’t technically granted approval to stevia but has affirmed it will not object to companies using it in foods and beverages. This puts stevia in a “grey zone” where the FDA could potentially target selected companies (small stevia producers) while ignoring other companies (Coca-Cola and Cargill, for example), even while they use essentially the same sweeteners.
The rest of the original breaking news article, shown below, has been corrected to account for this clarification.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued letters of non-objection for the use of a natural, zero-calorie sweetener it once sought to wipe out from the U.S. marketplace. Following political pressure from powerful consumer product corporations (Coca-Cola and Pepsi, primarily), the FDA has once again fallen in step with the interests of Big Business and legalized a food and beverage ingredient that it once aggressively oppressed.

In this case, however, the approval of this ingredient happens to be in the best interests of consumers. Why? Because it will largely replace aspartame, an artificial sweetener chemical linked to numerous neurological disorders, including headaches, eye disorders and other problems.

It will also unleash a wave of stevia-sweetened products for consumers, and that’s good news for diabetics or anyone seeking healthier products sweetened with an herbal extract rather than a synthetic chemical.

I publicly predicted this FDA decision just two weeks ago an article containing thirty-one predictions for 2009 (http://www.naturalnews.com/024976.html). The FDA’s approval of stevia is prediction #8, for those keeping track. (Interestingly, at least two of the top 13 predictions for 2009 have already come true in the last month of 2008!)

The circumstances surrounding this FDA approval of stevia reveal yet again the true loyalties of the agency. When stevia threatened the profits of aspartame, it was routinely suppressed by the agency. FDA thugs seized imports of stevia at the border, destroyed millions of dollars in stevia products, threatened companies with fines for daring to sell stevia, and even ordered one company to destroy its recipe books that mentioned stevia in dessert recipes. But now, when Coca-Cola and Pepsi want stevia approved, the FDA suddenly reverses its oppression and decides to legalize the herb.

Again, this is a rare case where the FDA’s decision benefits consumers, but the circumstances behind the decision were in no way motivated by consumer interest. They were motivated by corporate profits.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark