Archive for the ‘Tyranny Around the World’ Category

Obama’s banana problem

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

Eric Holder’s defence of Chiquita suggests he is a poor choice to be the next US attorney general.

Jason Glaser
guardian.co.uk

The selection of Eric Holder as the next attorney general of the United States is a deft political decision. Holder should face little if any opposition during the approval process given his bipartisan history. This would ensure a smooth transition at a time that requires decisive action. Still, Barack Obama’s selection may not be something to celebrate. The choice of Holder reveals a troubling disconnect between a key statement made by the president-elect during the campaign and views held by Holder. This disconnect must be examined in light of the dismal state of US foreign relations.

The issue of direct payments to the justice department by offending US corporations is a worrying trend. It is one that has risen sharply under the Bush administration and was first championed by former attorney general John Ashcroft. In lieu of a trial, companies are allowed to pay a fine directly to the justice department. These agreements are readily accepted by companies, as they are cost effective, avoid the stigma of public trial and don’t set precedents. None of the money paid goes to affected individuals or communities, which leaves any sense of justice wanting. There is also valid concern that abuse of this system may lead to companies being less scrupulous.

Representing Chiquita, Holder brokered a deal for the banana giant to pay $25m over five years to the justice department. This arrangement was made after Chiquita admitted in 2003 to providing $1.7m over six years to the paramilitary group The United Self Defense Forces of Colombia. This group was listed as a terrorist organisation by the state department. Chiquita also allegedly provided a cache of surplus Nicaraguan army AK-47s through their own transport network. The payments continued unabated for months after Chiquita’s admission.

The company claimed the payments were made to protect its workers, but it is unclear who was protected. Colombia’s attorney general, Mario Iguaran, roundly rejects Chiquita’s excuses. Iguaran believes the payments were made to secure the unimpeded production of bananas and to quell labour unrest. He claims that at least 4,000 people were killed by these paramilitaries. Hundreds of the victims were banana workers and labour organisers. Iguaran wishes to extradite the Chiquita executives responsible for approving the payments and a lawsuit is currently underway representing the families of 173 workers who were killed by the paramilitaries. Holder continues to represent Chiquita in the resulting civil case.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

Mothers are banned from looking after each other’s children

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009
Two working mothers have been banned from looking after each others toddlers because they are not registered childminders (a file picture from Mail Online)

Two working mothers have been banned from looking after each other's toddlers because they are not registered childminders (a file picture from Mail Online)

By Sarah Harris
Mail Online

Two working mothers have been banned from looking after each other’s toddlers because they are not registered childminders.

The close friends’ private arrangement had let them both return to part-time jobs at the same company.

However, a whistleblower reported them to the education watchdog Ofsted and it found their informal deal broke the law.

This was because little-known rules say friends cannot gain a ‘reward’ by looking after a child for more than two hours outside the child’s home without agreeing to a number of checks including one from the Criminal Records Bureau.

Although the mothers never paid each other, their job-sharing deal was judged to be a ‘reward’. Campaigners fear thousands of working families could be innocently breaking the rules by relying on close friends for informal childcare.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

UN staff accused of raping children in Sudan

Saturday, August 1st, 2009
Peacekeeping and civilian staff based in Juba are accused of picking up young children and forcing them to have sex. (telegraph.co.uk)

Peacekeeping and civilian staff based in Juba are accused of picking up young children and forcing them to have sex. (telegraph.co.uk)

By Kate Holt in Juba and Sarah Hughes
telegraph.co.uk
January 2007

The UN said today that it would launch an investigation after the Daily Telegraph reported allegations that UN personnel have abused children in southern Sudan.

Members of the United Nations peacekeeping forces in southern Sudan are facing allegations of raping and abusing children as young as 12, The Daily Telegraph reported today.

The abuse allegedly began two years ago when the UN mission in southern Sudan (UNMIS) moved in to help rebuild the region after a 23-year civil war. The UN has up to 10,000 military personnel in the region, of all nationalities and the allegations involve peacekeepers, military police and civilian staff.

The first indications of possible sexual exploitation emerged within months of the UN force’s arrival and The Daily Telegraph has seen a draft of an internal report compiled by the UN children’s agency Unicef in July 2005 referring to the problem.

This paper has learnt of more than 20 victims’ accounts claiming that some peacekeeping and civilian staff based in the town are regularly picking up young children in their UN vehicles and forcing them to have sex. It is thought that hundreds of children may have been abused.

“I was sitting by the river the first time it happened,” said Jonas, 14, one of more than 20 children who claimed they had been abused this way.

“A man in a white car drove past and asked me if I wanted to get into the car with him. I saw that the car was a UN car because it was white with the black letters on it. The man had a badge on his clothes. When he stopped the car, we got out, he put a blindfold on me and started to abuse me. It was painful and went on for a long time. When it was over we went back to the place we had been, and he pushed me out of the car and left.”

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

Crisis in the Congo: Sex Charges Roil U.N.

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

Fox News
March 03, 2005

Sylvie points at something in the distance but the 7-year-old tries to get away from the area where she was raped by a U.N. peacekeeper.

The spot where the crime took place was 20 yards from a U.N. base — 20 yards from the people who were supposed to keep her safe.

(Editor’s Note: This is the first part in a series about problems with the U.N. presence in the Congo. Check back on Friday for the next part on what happened to a “zero tolerance” policy for abusers.)

Five years ago, more than 10,000 peacekeepers working for the United Nations came to the Democratic Republic of Congo (search) to help end a six-nation war. But reports of sexual abuse of local women and girls began soon after they arrived from Morocco, South Africa, Australia, India and Europe.

“A U.N. man came from over there,” Sylvie said. “He had candy and called us over. My friends ran away but I went for the sweets. Then he did it to me.”

The rape may have damaged her internal organs and given her gonorrhea. When a team from FOX News took her to a hospital, she was too traumatized to let a doctor touch her.

In January, the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (search) released a report claiming peacekeepers regularly had sex with the Congolese women and girls in exchange for food or small sums of money.

“We have had and continue to have a serious problem of sexual exploitation and abuse,” William Lacy Swing, the U.N. special representative to Congo, said.

The scandal intensified after the recent discovery of hundreds of violent, pornographic photos and videotapes of children, supposedly taken by a U.N. official. The images depict naked Congolese children in positions of severe physical degradation performing sexual acts with and under the control of a man, the United Nations admits, who is one of their own.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

Perverted “peacemakers”: as the Bush administration’s collaboration with the UN becomes more overt, the world body is awash in scandals—from child prostitution to epic international bribery and graft

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

The New American
by William Norman Grigg
June 28, 2004

During the Senate’s debate over ratifying the League of Nations Covenant in 1919, Senator William Borah (R-Idaho) sought to disabuse his colleagues of the idea that a world “peace force” would be a blessing to mankind. An international “peacekeeping” army, warned Borah, would consist of “the gathered scum of the nations organized into a conglomerate international police force ordered hither and thither by the most heterogeneous and irresponsible body or court that ever confused or confounded the natural instincts and noble passions of a people.”

Nearly a century later, Borah’s prophetic words were echoed by former UN civilian “peacekeeper” Andrew Thomson, a coauthor of the new book Emergency Sex and Other Desperate Measures. Thomson, a physician who presently works as a medical officer at UN Headquarters in New York, has served as an aid worker in UN missions to Cambodia, Somalia, Rwanda, Liberia, Bosnia and Haiti. On the basis of his experience, Thomson offers a trenchant warning to readers: “If blue-helmeted UN peacekeepers show up in your town or village and offer to protect you, run. Or else get weapons. Your lives are worth so much less than theirs.”

The world body’s self-portrait as guardian of human rights is belied by the fact that “almost a million civilians [whom] our peacekeepers were supposed to protect died in two genocides,” Thomson observes in the book, which was coauthored by Kenneth Cain and Heidi Postlewait. (In fact, this estimate is much too low, given that Rwandan sources estimate that as many as 1.1 million people were slaughtered in that nation’s 1994 genocide.) When the Blue Helmets aren’t passively abetting genocide, or actively facilitating it by disarming targeted populations, they find other ways of inflicting misery in the name of “world peace.”

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark