Archive for the ‘Tyranny in China’ Category

Population control called key to deal

Saturday, December 12th, 2009
By Li Xing (China Daily)

COPENHAGEN: Population and climate change are intertwined but the population issue has remained a blind spot when countries discuss ways to mitigate climate change and slow down global warming, according to Zhao Baige, vice-minister of National Population and Family Planning Commission of China (NPFPC) .

“Dealing with climate change is not simply an issue of CO2 emission reduction but a comprehensive challenge involving political, economic, social, cultural and ecological issues, and the population concern fits right into the picture,” said Zhao, who is a member of the Chinese government delegation.

Many studies link population growth with emissions and the effect of climate change.

“Calculations of the contribution of population growth to emissions growth globally produce a consistent finding that most of past population growth has been responsible for between 40 per cent and 60 percent of emissions growth,” so stated by the 2009 State of World Population, released earlier by the UN Population Fund.

Although China’s family planning policy has received criticism over the past three decades, Zhao said that China’s population program has made a great historic contribution to the well-being of society.

As a result of the family planning policy, China has seen 400 million fewer births, which has resulted in 18 million fewer tons of CO2 emissions a year, Zhao said.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

Chinese Dissidents Gather at Consulate

Thursday, October 1st, 2009
Protestors from the Democratic Forum of China lay down and drape a banner over themselves in protest of the Chinese Communist Partys 60 years of rule, at the Chinese consulate in New York, Sept. 30, 2009. (Aloysio Santos/The Epoch Times)

Protestors from the Democratic Forum of China lay down and drape a banner over themselves in protest of the Chinese Communist Party's 60 years of rule, at the Chinese consulate in New York, Sept. 30, 2009. (Aloysio Santos/The Epoch Times)

By Matthew Robertson
Epoch Times Staff
Sep 30, 2009

Zhang Jing, who spends her spare time trying to help women in China, never thought that in the U.S. she’d see the colors of communist China on the Empire State Building.

“I felt sick,” she said, standing in the cold wind outside the Chinese Embassy on Wednesday night.

She had come out to protest the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 60 years of rule in China. What made her sick was the Empire State Building lighting up in red and yellow to honor the occasion.

Many in the Chinese community see the move as an affront, tantamount to America betraying them. “I never expected this to happen in America. I came to the U.S. to escape tyranny, and now when I come here I see it again. If I knew it would be like this, I wouldn’t have chosen to come to the U.S. I’d have gone to Europe back then.”

For people like Zhang Jing, communist China conjures images of violence, hatred, corruption, political repression, and fear. These are the modus operandi of the CCP, according to any dissident.

It was the first time Women’s Rights in China, her organization, had come out to protest. Just recently the CCP had blocked access to their Web site in the mainland, for no apparent reason, she said. “They’re just stingy, just petty and stingy. Even something as simple as women’s rights, they have to block it.” So Zhang Jing came out to make her voice heard.

On either side of Zhang were veteran democracy activists and Falun Gong practitioners, holding their own banners.

full text here
  • Share/Bookmark

Beijing’s ‘aim is to make people docile’

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009
A man reads the news on a public news wall in Beijing. Twenty to 30 editors-in-chief from Chinas major news outlets attend weekly meetings in the capital to take instruction from the nations propaganda department. Theyre told which stories to emphasize, and which must be downplayed. (SPENCER WYNN/TORONTO STAR)

A man reads the news on a public news wall in Beijing. Twenty to 30 editors-in-chief from China's major news outlets attend weekly meetings in the capital to take instruction from the nation's propaganda department. They're told which stories to emphasize, and which must be downplayed. (SPENCER WYNN/TORONTO STAR)

Propaganda apparatus is vast and scarily effective

Bill Schiller

Thestar.com

BEIJING – When the deputy editor of China’s Nan Guo Morning Post, Liu Yuan, first heard details of the death of a 15-year-old boy at a camp to cure Internet addiction, he knew he had a powerful story – and a public responsibility.

The details were shocking.

The boy had been dropped off at the camp by his parents on Aug. 1 about 2 p.m. and less than 14 hours later he was dead – savagely beaten by camp “trainers.” Locals later learned the camp was an unregistered business that apparently benefited from state money.

Liu dispatched a reporter and the Post broke the story Aug. 4, revealing that 12 people had been arrested and the camp shut down.

Internet addiction among Chinese youth is a serious problem, according to state media.

The news swept across the Internet like a summer storm, and soon, national media followed.

It was public service journalism of a high order, and further investigation revealed many children at the camp had been beaten.

In other countries, Liu might have received praise, a raise or perhaps a promotion – maybe even an award.

Instead, he lost his job.

Local Communist leaders felt the story had shamed the city – and made them look inept.

The local office of the party’s propaganda department, responsible for keeping a tight rein on the media, removed Liu from his position.

Liu might have intended to “serve the people” – to borrow a phrase from Mao Zedong – but local leaders felt he hadn’t served the party.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark

Teng Chen’s Escape from China

Saturday, August 1st, 2009

  • Share/Bookmark

How China’s Government Is Attempting To Control Chinese Media In America

Friday, July 31st, 2009

By Mei Duzhe
Jamestown Foundation

The U.S. Census 2000 data reveal dramatic growth over the past ten years in the Chinese American population. In these years the Chinese-American community has increased by 48 percent to over 2.4 million, making it the largest Asian ethnic group in the country.

Notably, surveys have found that of this Chinese-American population, as many as 82.9 percent speak the Chinese language at home, with 60.4 percent professing that their English skills are limited (www.asianmediaguide.com). As one might expect, these people’s dependence on Chinese-language media is heavy. And to a significant degree it is these media, as made available in the United States, that determine the worldview of many Chinese-Americans living in the States. Depictions of the democratic process, the rule of law, human rights and other American concepts come to the Chinese-American filtered through Chinese-language media. The content and nature of Chinese-language media (hereafter “Chinese media”) in America thus deserves greater scrutiny.

Before 1985, Chinese media operations in the United States came primarily from Taiwan and Hong Kong, with little influence from Communist Mainland China. This would change in the mid 1980s, however, when waves of immigration from Mainland China changed the profile of the Chinese-American community. The influx of Mainland Chinese piqued concerns of state-run media operations back home, triggering what can now be described as aggressive media efforts in the United States by mainland operations. Indeed, the Mainland China government has made major inroads into the Chinese media market here over the past decade.

Four main tactics characterize the Chinese government’s effort to influence Chinese media in America. First is the attempt to directly control newspapers, television stations, and radio stations through complete ownership or owning major shares. Second is the government’s use of economic ties to influence independent media who have business relations with China. This leverage has had major effects on the contents of broadcasting and publishing, effectively removing all material deemed “unfavorable” by the Chinese government. Third is the purchasing of broadcast time and advertising space (or more) from existing independent media. Closely related to this is the government’s providing free, ready-to-go programming and contents. Fourth is the deployment of government personnel to work in independent media, achieving influence from within their ranks.

These tactics have been applied with much effect to both national- and local-level Chinese media throughout the United States.

full text here

  • Share/Bookmark